Baseball Picks
Baseball Picks (May 1-5): 3-3 (+$55)
Baseball Picks (May 6-12): 1-1 (+$75)
2013 Season Winnings: 4-4 (+$130)
2012 Season Winnings: 19-19 (+$215)
2011 Season Winnings: 55-53 (-$940)
Follow @walterfootball for updates.
Baseball Picks (May 6-12): 1-1 (+$75)
2013 Season Winnings: 4-4 (+$130)
2012 Season Winnings: 19-19 (+$215)
2011 Season Winnings: 55-53 (-$940)
Follow @walterfootball for updates.
Kansas City Royals at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Royals +115; Angels -125.
8:10 PM ET (Game 971-972)
I don't understand this line at all. The Royals have the superior hitting, starting pitching and bullpen. The Angels are trash.
I may post another pick later. If so, I'll tweet it out. I'll have updates on Twitter - @walterfootball.
Prediction: Royals +115 (1 Unit)
|
GStar
06-02-2011
03:14 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx5.93
(total posts: 280)
 5
 5
ooooooh! That makes way more sense okman I was thinking "wtf Rockies dont play today".
- Personally I'm staying away from the Rockies until I know which team will show up.
@ anthony
06-02-2011
03:11 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.206
(total posts: 17)
5
5
"i love your picks i cannot live without them...you complete my life with your picks, win or lose." thank you so much, i don't care about the results, you're doing a great job...thank you so much again. i love you"
okman
06-02-2011
03:10 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx8.21
(total posts: 16)
5
5
@gstar I took the Rockies tomorrow what do u think today Pittsburg Rockies jiminez came through for me.
Debo
06-02-2011
03:09 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.107
(total posts: 49)
7
5
Small Plays on :
#1 - Arizona / Washington (first inning no score) #2 - Tampa Bay / Seattle (first inning no score) #3 - Washington / Arizona (Under 9)
GStar
06-02-2011
03:07 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx5.93
(total posts: 280)
5
5
My "insecure freak" comment still stands.
BC
06-02-2011
03:06 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx3.21
(total posts: 80)
5
5
@rr7313
Sorry bout that, who would of thought that pitt would beat up pelfry like that. damn. I took it too should have left off of it.
Obi One
06-02-2011
03:05 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx3.30
(total posts: 14)
5
6
@anthony (if it's the real one)
You did NOT just say that!! C'mon dude!
Debo
06-02-2011
03:04 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.107
(total posts: 49)
5
5
#1 - Arizona Diamondbacks (3 Unit)
#2 - Tampa Bay Rays (2 Unit) #3 - San Francisco Giants (1 Unit)
Anthony
06-02-2011
03:01 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.111
(total posts: 20)
6
5
@Gstar
Now I really know you are not comfortable when I post picks or post my winning percentage in baseball. Why else would you still be talking about it? You really do want to see me lose. And if that's true, then you are really a sad person deep down inside. And when I defend myself for your childish comments to me like "DB" which you apologized for, you then tell me I react ridiculous for defending myself for your stupidty. Get a life moron. You've been exposed.
rr7313
06-02-2011
03:01 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx8.31
(total posts: 16)
5
5
DAMN!!!!!! i'm down 5 units now cause of a 3 unit bet i took on mets to score first!!!! lol... Ok guys enough bickering lets talk who to take!
GStar
06-02-2011
02:59 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx5.93
(total posts: 280)
5
7
@Anthony
I think Walt should change it so you have to register and login to comment. That would end a lot of these issues. - @Obi One I appreciate that but that's not how I roll man. I like to help people out when I can and where I can. If I can give good advice on hockey games to help people win a little cash then that's all good. It makes up for me mooching picks in the football season. ;) - BTW do NOT expect any NFL picks from me unless I'm stealing them from someone else. Not my thing AT ALL. CFL, maybe, but not CFL.
mike
06-02-2011
02:56 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.206
(total posts: 17)
5
5
here's what I like today
Dbacks ML Rays ML Tampa/Sea under 6.5
Obi One
06-02-2011
02:53 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx3.30
(total posts: 14)
5
5
Finally,
can u guys feel it?....its called serenity :))) now back to the picks! I'm gone. Bash me tomorrow after ARI and TB lost. @GStar. Like the Karma, spread the wealth. But thruth be told, you are good on hockey and I wouldn't mind payning for it.
Anthony
06-02-2011
02:53 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx.111
(total posts: 20)
6
6
@Gstar
Yes, your right. It doesn't take balls to post on the Internet. But some people still post BS comments without putting their real name. What does that tell you about a persons character? We need to tell Walter to make it where it shows your IP Address on the side of the comment. I guarantee the BS would stop and this would make this forum much better.
Obi One
06-02-2011
02:50 pm
xxx.xxx.xxx3.30
(total posts: 14)
6
6
@tascblue thank you!
@gstar Yes he does hit 70% check his picks. He's not picking all games, he's picking mostly "1st inning no score" bets. And winning most of em. So 70% looks off, but he's right there. @Anthony If those people did that, they suck. But still, keep up the good work. @yep stop talking. Fo shizzle?! |
Los Angeles Angels at Houston Astros.
Line: Angels -135; Astros +125.
8:10 PM ET (Game 969-970)
Joe Blanton is an absolutely terrible pitcher and should not be favored on the road against anyone. I know the Astros stink, but so do the Angels. They've been overrated for years.
I may post another pick later. If so, I'll tweet it out. I'll have updates on Twitter - @walterfootball.
Prediction: Astros +125 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$125
Minnesota Twins at Boston Red Sox.
Line: Twins +185; Red Sox -200.
7:10 PM ET (Game 961-962)
It's no surprise that the Red Sox were swept in Texas. Their hot start was pretty unrealistic, and they're bound to regress to the norm. Considering they have no available bullpen tonight, the Twins at +185 looks like a decent deal. This line should probably be -170/+160.
I may post another pick later. If so, I'll tweet it out. I'll have updates on Twitter - @walterfootball.
Prediction: Twins +185 (0.5 Units) -- Incorrect; -$50
Baltimore Orioles at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Orioles +125; Angels -135.
3:35 PM ET (Game 925-926)
Copy-paste action again here: I once again don't understand why the Orioles are underdog. They have the superior hitters and bullpen.
Prediction: Orioles +125 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$125
Baltimore Orioles at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Orioles +135; Angels -145.
4:05 PM ET (Game 971-972)
Copy-paste action here: I once again don't understand why the Orioles are underdog. They have the superior hitters and bullpen.
Prediction: Orioles +135 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$135
Baltimore Orioles at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Orioles +120; Angels -130.
10:05 PM ET (Game 927-928)
I once again don't understand why the Orioles are underdog. They have the superior hitters and bullpen. The starting pitching is about the same tonight, so Baltimore should be favored by about -120.
Prediction: Orioles +120 (1 Unit) -- Incorrect; -$120
Miami Marlins at Philadelphia Phillies.
Line: Marlins +195; Phillies -220.
7:05 PM ET (Game 953-954)
The Phillies and Marlins stink, but the latter is hotter, having won three of four. I feel like Philadelphia should be -155 or so, which means there's tons of value with Miami.
I may post another pick later. If so, I'll tweet it out. I'll have updates on Twitter - @walterfootball.
Prediction: Marlins +195 (1 Unit) -- Incorrect; -$100
Baltimore Orioles at Los Angeles Angels.
Line: Orioles +110; Angels -120.
7:05 PM ET (Game 953-954)
I don't understand why the Orioles are underdog. They have the better startng pitcher and bullpen, and they're the superior squad overall.
Prediction: Orioles +110 (1 Unit) -- Correct; +$110
Chicago White Sox at Texas Rangers.
Line: White Sox +105; Rangers -115.
8:05 PM ET (Game 923-924)
The NFL Draft is over, so I'm now ready to lose money betting baseball. The Rangers look like a solid play today, as my projected line for them was -125. Texas has been the hotter team, while Chris Sale has not pitched as well on the road.
Prediction: Rangers -115 (1 Unit) -- Incorrect; -$115
Note: For legality purposes, this Web site does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.
2013 Fantasy Football Rankings - June 19
2014 NFL Mock Draft - June 18
Charlie's 2014 NFL Mock Draft - June 17
2013 NBA Mock Draft - May 22
NFL Picks - Feb. 3
© 1999-2013 Walter Cherepinsky : all rights reserved
Privacy Policy
2 5 9
Leave a comment