The ping pong balls will be plucked Tuesday night and we will find out who wins the John Wall sweepstakes, otherwise known as the 2010 NBA Draft lottery.
Since its inception, we have learned how this night can forever change the face of a franchise. Just ask the Knicks and Patrick Ewing, or the Spurs and Tim Duncan. In fact, only three times since 1990 has the team with the best odds of landing the No. 1 overall pick actually won the lottery. Last year, the Kings had the best percentage and actually ended up drafting fourth, while the Clippers had luck on their side moving into the No. 1 slot.
So who needs the ping pong ball to bounce their way this time around? Allow me to break down each lottery team, how badly they need the No. 1 pick, and what it would mean for their future.
New Jersey Nets: 25%
Winning the first pick is not just important for the Nets because it would add Wall, but it would also increase their likelihood of landing one or two of the marquee free agents with all their cap space. Sure, New Jersey does not need a point guard per se since they have Devin Harris, but by drafting Wall, the Nets could turn around and trade Harris for another valuable asset.
In the same regard, it's not the end of the world if they don't land the No. 1 pick and Wall since they already have Harris. Settling for Evan Turner would give New Jersey some needed scoring punch on the wing or even getting Derrick Favors would help fill a hole at the power forward spot.
Minnesota Timberwolves: 19.9%
I am kind of hoping the Timberwolves win the lottery just for the pure comedic value. David Kahn drafted Ricky Rubio and Jonny Flynn with the fifth and sixth picks, so they absolutely do not need Wall, but it would be funny to see how Kahn could mess this up. Common sense would say the T-Wolves either draft Wall and then trade Flynn and maybe even the rights to Rubio, or trade down with the pick so they can land Turner, Favors, or Wesley Johnson; all of whom truly fit a need for Minnesota.
Sacramento Kings: 15.6%
Let's just say I would watch all 82 Kings games next season if last year's first-round pick and Rookie of the Year Tyreke Evans was paired up with Wall. That would be a scary, scary thought as a backcourt of the future.
Golden State Warriors: 10.4%
With Stephen Curry and Monta Ellis already manning the backcourt, the Warriors would either trade down with the No. 1 pick, or draft Wall and then likely try to trade Ellis. Again, the Wall/Curry backcourt for the next 5-10 years would be a dangerous duo especially when you add in the strong piece acquired for Ellis.
Washington Bullets: 10.3%
The Wizards are building from scratch after blowing up their roster at the trade deadline and desperately need a face of the future since Gilbert Arenas is clearly not that guy. Washington could draft Wall and shift Arenas to the two, assuming he does not threaten to shoot any of his teammates and end up getting suspended again.
Philadelphia 76ers: 5.3%
The Sixers used their first-round pick last year on Jrue Holiday who put together a solid rookie season and seems to be headed down the right path of being their point guard of the future. However, Holiday is no Wall and Philly is desperate for a star player since Andre Iguodala is better suited being the No. 2 guy on a team and Elton Brand is a shell of the player he once was. Wall would be the obvious pick.
Detroit Pistons: 5.2%
The Pistons roster is loaded with wing players and their No. 1 priority is to address their need for a big man through the 2010 NBA Draft. With that being said, Wall could still be the choice and Detroit would then have try and trade current point guard Rodney Stuckey in hopes of filling that void up front. If not, the Pistons could try and trade down a couple spots and snag Favors or DeMarcus Cousins.
Los Angeles Clippers: 2.3%
Even though they have Baron Davis, Wall would still be the pick and then Davis would likely be shopped. Let's hope this does not happen though because Wall would almost certainly suffer some sort of Clipper Curse injury like last year's top pick Blake Griffin did last season.
Utah Jazz: 2.2%
This would be interesting and probably drive Knicks fans insane. The Jazz have one of the best point guards in the league in Deron Williams and would probably shop the pick in hopes of adding another piece to their established roster, or just take Favors or Turner instead at No. 1. Landing the top pick would also increase the likelihood of Carlos Boozer returning to Salt Lake City.
Indiana Pacers: 1.1%
The Pacers have been searching for an answer at the point for several years now and Wall would be the perfect solution. He would also give Danny Granger a badly needed wingman.
New Orleans Hornets: 0.8%
The Hornets already have Chris Paul and last year's first-round pick Darren Collison who did a great job filling in when Paul was hurt this season. They would likely consider taking Evan Turner but also have a need for depth up front, making DeMarcus Cousins and Derrick Favors options as well. A trade would be another possibility to move down a couple spots and possibly clear some cap space as well.
Memphis Grizzlies: 0.7%
Mike Conley has not grown into the point guard position like the Grizzlies hoped, so Wall would replace him as their future floor leader, then making Conley expendable.
Toronto Raptors: 0.6%
Jose Calderon and Jarrett Jack were both rather disappointing last season so Wall would definitely be the likely candidate. Plus, it may help the effort of re-signing Chris Bosh when there is a future stud point guard joining the team. However, the Raptors could possibly take Favors or Cousins as a replacement for Bosh if their confidence is not high that he will return.
Houston Rockets: 0.5%
Houston point guard Aaron Brooks was named the NBA's most improved player this past season but the Rockets would still probably take Wall. Brooks and Wall could possibly play in the same backcourt, or Houston could try and deal one of the two.
It's a little strange how there are so many mocks with varying opinions of Derek Barnett where some have him as a top 10 pick, others falling outside, others have him sliding to the 20's and yet he was graded almost the same as Myles Garrett and everyone has Garrett going Top 3. I personally have Barnett as the best EDGE in the draft, and can see the case being made for either of them being Top 3 selections in my opinion. I can see Cleveland trading out of the spot again. Just strange how the opinions of Barnett vary with no solid reason as to why except "he may not produce at an NFL level the way he did in college" which is a weak argument cause I mean... isn't that true with every prospect? Has Jadeveon Clowney produced like he has in college? Nothing is a sure thing...